• Archives

  • Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

    ‘What Should I Post on Facebook?’ 12 Facebook Tactics Working Right Now

    Monday, March 30th, 2015

    If you feel challenged by Facebook marketing these days, you should know you’re not alone.

    In an increasingly crowded news feed, Facebook’s algorithm updates can make it tough for brands to get much notice.

    In fact, brands are now responding to plunging organic reach on Facebook by posting more content to Instagram than they are to Facebook, according to a report by research firm L2.

    But don’t despair; there’s plenty of life left in Facebook yet. We’ve been scouring the web to find out what’s working on Facebook …

    The post ‘What Should I Post on Facebook?’ 12 Facebook Tactics Working Right Now appeared first on Social.

    Music SEO – 7 Lessons in Brand Optimization for 2015

    Monday, March 30th, 2015

    Posted by evolvingSEO

    Bands, music, and SEO – A different paradigm

    For B2B or ecommerce, people often
    discover your brand with commercial queries like “dining room lamps” or an informational search like “how to fix a dishwasher”.

    Then they look around your site, your social profiles, get retargeted—before ever making a purchase—but in many cases that journey started with an non-branded organic search. Search is certainly not the
    only discovery channel. But important enough that investment in non-branded keywords is essential.

    A (very simplified) illustration of this discovery path might look something like this:

    content discovery path b2b ecommerce

    The above is NOT the case for musicians and bands though.
    When’s the last time you discovered a band with a search engine? Probably never.

    For bands and musicians, the discovery path is
    flipped around. THIS is probably more realistic:

    discovery path for bands

    The search engine is
    more about reducing friction on the path to becoming a die-hard fan. I don’t think many people are discovering their new favorite band like this:

    searching for bands on google

    But you HAVE probably tried to learn more about bands and musicians
    after the initial discovery with searches like this:

    current fan search


    (No, I am not a Lumineers fan—just so there’s no confusion 😉 )

    I don’t think many musicians, bands, record labels or managers are looking at this aspect of search. Sure, you can hope that users and Google “just figure it out.” Or you can be proactive and create the best fan experience possible.


    SEO for bands = The branded keyword experience

    So the REAL opportunity in keywords for bands and musicians is the fan experience here:

    google autosuggest band search terms

    It’s their “branded” terms (or what I like to call “PropWords“—proprietary keywords):

    • band name
    • musician names
    • album names
    • song names
    • lyrics
    • performance dates
    • interviews
    • etc…

    For example, there’s a TON of volume around Lupe Fiasco’s branded terms—and this is only the tip of the iceberg:

    branded search terms lupe fiasco

    Just because no one’s discovering Lupe Fiasco in organic search, doesn’t mean there’s no opportunity. It’s just not in the normal places you’d look for B2B or eCommerce opportunity.

    So that’s the lens through which the rest of this post should be seen through. SEO for bands is primarily about the
    fan experience searching their branded terms.


    Search result opportunities for bands

    1. Event listings

    1.1 Optimize your own site for general tour searches

    As a band, it’s important to keep fans and potential fans in your ecosystem. You should keep fans on your properties (website, social etc) as much as possible—so as not to give up extra traffic to third party sites. Being visible for your own event searches is a critical way to keep them there.

    Let’s use on of my new favorite bands,
    Sylvan Esso. Here’s an example of what Google typically shows for a tour search—for the query “sylvan esso tour dates”:

    search results sylvan esso

    I imagine for this query,
    fans are trying to get a list of all tour dates. So what is Google doing now? They are providing the list front and center.

    You notice that Sylvan Esso only has one result—everything else goes to a third party site. This is already a lost opportunity to drive more fans to
    their site.

    They could
    optimize for clicks by aligning the likely user intent with their appearance in the SERP. Using the SEO Mofo SERP tool, I came up with:

    sylvan esso tour dates search results

    This listing may perform better because:

    • It aligns with most likely user intent (browse all dates/location & purchase)
    • The URL is more informative
    • It promises something exclusive (as long as they deliver—maybe with a group discount, a meet and greet etc).

    This is the start to funneling fans through your website instead of a third party.

    1.2 Create pages for individual shows (with caution)

    Some fans may opt to click a tour date Google has provided. What does Google do next?

    tour dates serp

    Google then returns a page like this—with a TON of stuff:

    band serp

    This SERP is packed! It includes:

    • A date carousel
    • A large AdWords ad
    • A map card
    • Knowledge Graph card
    • Top result has 4 site-links
    • 7 more normal organic results, some with date snippets and extra links

    Here’s the kicker. There’s only
    one tiny little link to sylvanesso.com—in the map card. And it goes to their homepage. They have a pretty poor shot at driving users to their website here.

    Let’s look at a result for a specific Dave Matthews Band tour date:

    dave matthews serp

    They’re doing it a little better. Few observations with this one:

    • Their link in the map goes to their tour page
    • The #1 organic listing goes to their website—because they have a specific page for that exact show.
    • The amount of stuff in this SERP is still immense. The first organic result is way below the fold.
    • The “with caution” part is that—you don’t want to just create individual pages for every show, without trying to add something of value to them—like information about the venue, past show pictures from that venue, etc. These pages can get quite “thin” and this isn’t a good thing either.

    1.3 Tag your site to get official ticket links

    Finally, the biggest change in Google is the addition of official ticketing agents. To use one of their examples, let’s look at
    Google’s example of “ariana grande tour” (and no, definitely not a secret Ariana Grande fan—although some of the production is decent):

    Not only do the tour dates show up at the top, but check out this
    preferred ticketing link showing prominently in the Map Card:

    official ticket agent in band serp

    Google
    first announced this capability about a year ago. And they have recently expanded this for comedians and concert venues as well. Here is Google’s official developer documentation on event markup for performers: https://developers.google.com/structured-data/events/performers I want to note, they are giving preferential treatment to official artist websites:

    event markup for performer sites

    You have three options to specify event info:

    1. HTML—code it directly into your page
    2. Plugins or Widgets
    3. New “Delegation” Markup—indicate Google to source it from another webpage

    2. Make an app (or several) and index them

    For those not aware,
    App Indexing is getting pretty real. I think this is a major opportunity for bands and musicians. Let’s look at mobile search volume for a few albums that have come out recently:

    mobile search volume for recent albums

    According to my small sample, at least 44% of album name searches are on a mobile device (not even including tablets). Recent claims are that Android has
    almost 50% of the smartphone market share. For Alicia Keys, that would mean about 18,500 searches a month for “girl on fire” on an Android.

    Are you seeing the opportunity? No? Well, Bjork did:

    bjork app

    She had an app developed just for her new album, Biophillia. Now, Android users searching Google for this album will be able to purchase and experience the “multimedia exploration” in this app.

    If I was a label, I’d be experimenting with making apps for all albums by artists—filling them with an exclusive experience—and seeing what happens.

    Google put together their
    4-steps to appiness—and easy to follow guide to get your Android app indexed in Google search.

    3. Get a Knowledge Graph result

    I know we’ve look at musicians who have already reached a threshold of popularity. They are likely to have a Knowledge Graph result already.

    But what if you’re an up and coming musician? You may not have a Knowledge Graph result—but perhaps with a little nudge you can get one. For example, a friend of mine (and old bandmate)
    Lost Midas is now a solo electrofusion producer and songwriter. He is signed to an independent label and even just performed at SXSW—but unfortunately Google does not show a Knowledge Graph result:

    missing knowledge graph in serp

    What could someone like him do to get in the Knowledge Graph?

    One thing I found interesting was Google’s suggestions for how performers specifically can get in the Knowledge Graph. It’s
    buried at the bottom of the event listings page:

    3.1 Get listed in Wikipedia

    This is easier said than done. Be sure to read their
    inclusion criteria for music.

    If you feel the band or musician is notable enough to get into Wikipedia, you can then
    start the process here. That is the official page to add an article request for bands and musicians. Please note, Wikipedia does not want you to list yourself.

    As Google states above—
    be sure the official homepage is recorded correctly. I take this to mean—list the exact (“canonical”) version of your homepage URL. The one you would verify in Webmaster Tools.

    You may also find this article on how someone claimed to
    sneak through Wiki’s notability test interesting (although I can’t officially say how good that method is).

    3.2 Get listed in MusicBrainz

    The other site Google recommends getting listed in is
    MusicBrainz.org. I don’t have much experience with this site, but you can go here to learn about making contributions.

    musicbrainz

    3.3 Upload audio to Archive.org

    Note, this is
    just my hunch. But if Google is using Wikipedia and MusicBrainz to inform their Knowledge Graph results—perhaps they use Archive.org. Why not? It’s one of the most authoritative sources on the web.

    With Archive.org you can
    upload entire concerts to their site:

    archive.org

    3.4 Create and verify a Google Plus page

    Right, I know. “No one uses Google Plus.” “Google Plus is dying.” Perhaps there are elements of truth there. But I’d be surprised if having a Google Plus page verified with your website doesn’t somehow impact Knowledge Graph listings.

    My friend does not have a Google Plus listing currently:

    searching for band's google plus page

    For those needing to create and verify a Google Plus page:

    1. Go here and choose “Brand” to create a page. (Note, you are not creating a personal page. This is a mistake I see many organizations making).
    2. And then link your website to your brand page by following those instructions.

    4. Customize your Knowledge Graph

    Once you
    have a Knowledge Graph listing—that’s just the beginning! Google recently added ways to control what appears there.

    4.1 Specify your logo

    For bands (and all organizations really) branding is an essential element of success. Google now gives you the opportunity to
    directly control the logo users see in your Knowledge Graph result:

    customizing a band's knowledge graph result

    As you can see above, the jazz group
    The Bad Plus has a random picture from an article showing—when perhaps there is a better photo they would prefer. This may be especially important from a consistency of branding standpoint.

    4.2 Specify your social profiles

    In addition, you can also
    directly control what social media links show in the knowledge graph. As I’ve mentioned, getting users to follow you on social is a key goal for bands in terms of audience development. Your audience is everything. And for bands, most search activity is going to come from their brand name. Why not make it easier for them to discover your social profiles?

    For example, the amazing “Livetronica” Band (live electronica music)
    The New Deal could get all of their social links to show in their Knowledge Box:

    missing social profiles in knowledge graph

    As you can see they are missing a huge opportunity to get more fans to their Instagram, Twitter and Soundcloud profiles. There’s at least 1,700 searches a month for “the new deal music” and “the new deal band”.

    5. Have a crawlable and indexable site

    For some reason, I have noticed sites in the music industry tend to be pretty inferior. This could be due to labels using poor frameworks, or the band/artist needing to just get a website up the quickest, cheapest and easiest way possible. This can cause some issues though.

    Let’s check out my friend’s site again. He’s currently on the Flavors.me platform. It looks like there’s several “pages” to the user, but to Google his website is just all one page:

    cached band page

    As mentioned, this is a common yet often overlooked issue with music websites I see. In fact, despite Bjork getting it right by having an app—her website has the same issue:

    cached webpage for bjork

    Her
    website (which actually does looks like an impressive creative endeavor) is built with hashes # in the URLs. Which makes the individual pages uncrawlable.

    This shows up as an issue if I try to find her mailing list in Google:

    serp for uncrawlable band page

    The first result goes to her record label’s page. That’s fine right? Well, not really because she has her own mailing list:

    page visible to searcher not search engine

    Because of how the website is built though, that page is basically invisible to Google—and users can not easily find it from a search.

    The absence of Bjork’s mailing list in search results is a
    critical oversight. For an artist, your mailing list is one of your strongest assets.

    5. Leverage your own YouTube channel

    As it’s often said, YouTube is the second largest search engine. And there’s no doubt music queries make up a huge percentage of their overall search volume.

    5.1 Create a YouTube channel

    I’m sad to have to say this, but many bands don’t seem to even have a YouTube page of their own. Again, they are missing a massive opportunity to funnel fans searching for their content to their YouTube account—where they can grow subscribers, promote music and cross-promote other channels.

    For example, that band The New Deal does not have their own YouTube channel:

    branded youtube channel

    Their live performances are a core selling point. This drives a ton of activity around their band in YouTube (people looking for concert footage). If they added some of their own on their own channel, they could capture a lot of this activity and engage with the fans.

    5.2 Add video content fans are looking for

    Having a channel is great, but fans are often looking for specific pieces of content. It’s really nice to have lots of fans that upload this content for you for fun, but capturing some of this activity is important.

    For example, another new band I have been liking a lot –
    Made In Heights—could be doing this:

    search opportunities on youtube

    Fans are looking for live performances, and the only ones there now are all fan uploads.

    You can use YouTube search suggest to find other things fans are searching for. I don’t see it mentioned often, but KeywordTool.io allows you to get
    YouTube search suggestions:

    keywordtool.io youtube suggestions

    This can quickly give you ideas of what content to add to your band page in YouTube:

    keyword suggestions youtube

    The above screenshot shows the most common searches around “Made In Heights”. They mostly look like song names. If I were that band, I’d make sure they have video or content for every one of those songs.

    You can use YouTube directly of course to find search suggestions off of the band name. For example, there are a lot of lyric searches. This makes sense. People want to listen to the song while reading the lyrics:

    lyric search autosuggest

    Wow! Yet, what happens when we look in YouTube for “made in heights lyrics”?

    search results lyrics youtube

    Never mind the band not having any lyric results—NO one has any lyric results. This is definitely an opportunity to provide content that doesn’t exist within YouTube.

    5.3 Create playlists

    Playlists are also overlooked in YouTube. They have many benefits:

    • Make your content easier to discover by organizing it.
    • Keep viewers on your content, in your channel
    • I’ve heard it rumored that creation of playlists can help you rank better in YouTube search only if your channel helps YouTube keep viewers… inside YouTube. Playlists can do this.
    • You can organize videos from any account into your playlists.
    • You can also rank in Google search with playlists (more on that below)

    I started using playlists on my YouTube
    music channel (where I mainly post covers and tutorials of hip-hop songs on piano)—and at least anecdotally—have seen my view count rise faster than usual:

    youtube playlists

    (I sure did use the word “content” a lot in that screenshot!)

    Many popular artists in YouTube don’t have any playlists though—for example
    Flying Lotus:

    missing band playlist youtube

    You can also
    curate playlists of videos about your band no matter who uploaded it. For example, let’s say you’re Drake (OK, maybe Drake’s record label or social media manager). You could curate playlists of the best Drake interviews, no matter who uploaded them:

    drake seo suggestions

    Then when fans search, they may discover the playlist on Drake’s channel which could earn subscriptions and also get them watching their chosen interviews.

    Speaking of Drake—remember when I mentioned you could rank in Google search with YouTube playlists? Take a look at this:

    drake serp

    That’s a random
    fan playlist ranking #1 for “drake playlist”—which gets 1,600 searches a month. That’s not an outlying case though. I barely had to look further for another example:

    john legend playlist serp

    “john legend playlist” gets 720 searches a month—and two fan playlists rank at the top.

    6. Contribute to Medium.com

    While the idea of “guest posting” is saturated in many industries, I don’t see this being done a whole lot in the music industry. That’s why I was impressed when I noticed a DJ named
    A-Trak posted this compelling article about rap in 2014:

    guest posting for bands on medium

    A few months later, this article has earned:

    • 254 recommendations on Medium
    • 1,480 Facebook shares
    • 470 tweets
    • 336 Google +1’s
    • Including shares by Fred Wilson (380,000+ followers) and pianist Chilly Gonzales (40,000+ followers and high relevance)

    It even ranks #2 for [rap in 2014]:

    serp for rap in 2014

    Although not super high volume, it potentially ranks for a lot of long tail—and will bring in consistent brand discovery from a relevant audience.

    6. Provide exclusive content about your lyrics

    The SEO world is no stranger to lyric searches. Just last year, Rap Genius (now just “Genius”) was
    caught up in a Google penalty. And back on December 19, Glenn Gabe was the first to notice Google displaying full lyrics in search results:

    band-provided lyric content in serps


    Glenn Gabe’s screenshot from December 19, 2014 of Google displaying lyrics in search.

    Glenn also recently published a pretty
    in depth study about lyrics in the SERPs I highly recommend you check out.

    In his article, Glenn astutely points out that when you add the word “meaning” to your lyrics search—the lyrics box goes away—which I found to be true looking at Sylvan Esso “Coffee” lyrics:

    lyrics meaning in serps

    As a band you could release exclusive content about your lyrics such as:

    • A photo of where they were originally written (on a napkin while on tour etc)
    • The story about how/why they were written
    • An explanation about their style (rhyme patterns, metaphors, references to history etc.)
    • Share old/original versions of the lyrics or a certain line and the process of revisions

    Fans and music publications could also create exclusive content about the lyrics. They could interview the band about their meaning—or publish their own in-depth interpretation of the meaning.

    I also want to point out—there can be a
    lot of search volume for a single line of a song lyric, if the song and artist are popular enough. Check out the volume for this one line by Drake:

    lyric search by line

    That’s 1,000 searches a month (certainly skewed all towards February, when the album came out) for “runnin’ through the 6 with my woes”.

    And I want to point out, 65% of those searches are being done on
    mobile phones

    mobile lyric searches

    Check out search volume for Adele lyrics from years ago now:

    adele lyric search

    “But I set fire to the rain” and “watched it pour as I touched your face” both get decent volume and have a good share of mobile share.

    Yet there is only one result in this SERP explaining the meaning to this line:

    lyric search opportunity

    There’s definitely value to be found by:

    • finding lines from lyrics with search volume
    • creating content to satisfy the user intent

    Both the artists AND third party publishers have an opportunity here. Genius.com is really the only true player in this space right now!

    7. Optimize for real name searches

    Remember my friend “Lost Midas”? This is obviously not his real name. It’s Jason Trikakis. Not a hugely common name. So a search for it should return his website #1 right?

    real name searches in serps

    Wrong. You can’t always rely on Google to “figure it out.” The problem here stems back to the fact his website is not very search-friendly. His name is on the website but very hard for Google to find.

    Solution in this case would be:

    • Ultimately to be on a better web platform.
    • But also adding his name into the title of the page (if possible on Flavors.me) would certainly be a step in the right direction 🙂

    Also—remember Sylvan Esso? What if one were to be searching around for “Nick Sanborn” who makes up 1/2 of the Sylvan Esso duo?

    real name search for band member

    Now, I’d never argue something from sylvanesso.com should appear at the top. But there’s nothing from their domain on the first page. As a fan, I’d probably enjoy at least one result from one of their own domains.

    Here’s a few ideas for them:

    • Create a bio page on their own site
    • Have a personal website which can then get people to the band website etc

    There’s SO much more I could have mentioned in terms of marketing music these days. When I
    played in bands it was the days of MySpace 🙂 I don’t even think YouTube was out yet.

    There are so many opportunities out there now with social media, platforms like Soundcloud and Bandcamp. I left a LOT out of this post.

    If you have any questions at all, please ask in the comments below! And I also love to chat about music!

    Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!

    The Delightfully Short Guide to Social Media ROI

    Thursday, March 26th, 2015

    If the concept of social media ROI feels rather enormous, you’re not alone.

    I am amazed—and sometimes astounded—at the breadth of the topic.

    So that’s made the exercise of writing a “delightfully short” guide to social media ROI all the more fun and challenging. I’ve given myself under 1,000 words to provide an overview of social media ROI and how to apply it to your social media marketing efforts. I’d love to hear your feedback in the comments!

    What Does Social Media ROI Look Like?

    ROI has its …

    The post The Delightfully Short Guide to Social Media ROI appeared first on Social.

    The Research & Science Behind Finding Your Best Profile Picture

    Wednesday, March 25th, 2015

    One of the first things I do when I join a new social network is to upload a profile picture.

    But which profile picture should I choose? Is there a best one?

    Profile pictures have always been a bit of a gray area for me inasmuch as I post a picture I think looks good without knowing its actual effect on my audience.

    Is there such thing as a perfect, best profile picture?

    Interestingly, there’s been some rather great research about the different elements of profile pictures …

    The post The Research & Science Behind Finding Your Best Profile Picture appeared first on Social.

    Headline Writing and Title Tag SEO in a Clickbait World – Whiteboard Friday

    Friday, March 20th, 2015

    Posted by randfish

    When writing headlines and title tags, we’re often conflicted in what we’re trying to say and (more to the point) how we’re trying to say it. Do we want it to help the page rank in SERPs? Do we want people to be intrigued enough to click through? Or are we trying to best satisfy the searcher’s intent? We’d like all three, but a headline that achieves them all is incredibly difficult to write.

    In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Rand illustrates just how small the intersection of those goals is, and offers a process you can use to find the best way forward.

    For reference, here’s a still of this week’s whiteboard!

    title tag whiteboard

    Video transcription

    Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week we’re going to chat about writing titles and headlines, both for SEO and in this new click-bait, Facebook social world. This is kind of a challenge, because I think many folks are seeing and observing that a lot of the ranking signals that can help a page perform well are often preceded or well correlated with social activity, which would kind of bias us towards saying, “Hey, how can I do these click-baity, link-baity sorts of social viral pieces,” versus we’re also a challenge with, “Gosh, those things aren’t as traditionally well performing in search results from a perhaps click-through rate and certainly from a search conversion perspective. So how do we balance out these two and make them work together for us based on our marketing goals?” So I want to try and help with that.

    Let’s look at a search query for Viking battles, in Google. These are the top two results. One is from Wikipedia. It’s a category page — Battles Involving the Vikings. That’s pretty darn straightforward. But then our second result — actually this might be a third result, I think there’s a indented second Wikipedia result — is the seven most bad ass last stands in the history of battles. It turns out that there happen to be a number of Viking related battles in there, and you can see that in the meta description that Google pulls. This one’s from Crack.com.

    These are pretty representative of the two different kinds of results or of content pieces that I’m talking about. One is very, very viral, very social focused, clearly designed to sort of do well in the Facebook world. One is much more classic search focused, clearly designed to help answer the user query — here’s a list of Viking battles and their prominence and importance in history, and structure, and all those kinds of things.

    Okay. Here’s another query — Viking jewelry. Going to stick with my Viking theme, because why not? We can see a website from Viking jewelry. This one’s on JellDragon.com. It’s an eCommerce site. They’re selling sterling silver and bronze Viking jewelry. They’ve actually done very classic SEO focus. Not only do they have Viking jewelry mentioned twice, in the second instance of Viking jewelry, I think they’ve intentionally — I hope it was intentionally — misspelled the word “jewelry” to hopefully catch misspellings. That’s some old-school SEO. I would actually not recommend this for any purpose.

    But I thought it was interesting to highlight versus in this search result it takes until page three until I could really find a viral, social, targeted, more link-baity, click-baity type of article, this one from io9 — 1,000 Year-old Viking Jewelry Found On Danish Farm. You know what the interesting part is? In this case, both of these are on powerful domains. They both have quite a few links to them from many external sources. They’re pretty well SEO’d pages.

    In this case, the first two pages of results are all kind of small jewelry website stores and a few results from like Etsy and Amazon, more powerful authoritative domains. But it really takes a long time before you get these, what I’d consider, very powerful, very strong attempts at ranking for Viking jewelry from more of your click-bait, social, headline, viral sites. io9 certainly, I would kind of expect them to perform higher, except that this doesn’t serve the searcher intent.

    I think Google knows that when people look for Viking jewelry, they’re not looking for the history of Viking jewelry or where recent archeological finds of Viking jewelry happened. They’re looking specifically for eCommerce sites. They’re trying to transact and buy, or at least view and see what Viking jewelry looks like. So they’re looking for photo heavy, visual heavy, potentially places where they might buy stuff. Maybe it’s some people looking for artifacts as well, to view the images of those, but less of the click-bait focus kind of stuff.

    This one I think it’s very likely that this does indeed perform well for this search query, and lots of people do click on that as a positive result for what they’re looking for from Viking battles, because they’d like to see, “Okay, what were the coolest, most amazing Viking battles that happened in history?”

    You can kind of see what’s happened here with two things. One is with Hummingbird and Google’s focus on topic modeling, and the other with searcher intent and how Google has gotten so incredibly good at pattern matching to serve user intent. This is really important from an SEO perspective to understand as well, and I like how these two examples highlight it. One is saying, “Hey, just because you have the most links, the strongest domain, the best keyword targeting, doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll rank if you’re not serving searcher intent.”

    Now, when we think about doing this for ourselves, that click-bait versus searched optimized experience for our content, what is it about? It’s really about choosing. It’s about choosing searcher intent, our website and marketing goals, or click-bait types of goals. I’ve visualized the intersection here with a Venn diagram. So these in pink here, the click-bait pieces that are going to resonate in social media — Facebook, Twitter, etc. Blue is the intent of searchers, and purple is your marketing goals, what you want to achieve when visitors get to your site, the reason you’re trying to attract this traffic in the first place.

    This intersection, as you will notice, is super, uber tiny. It is miniscule. It is molecule sized, and it’s a very, very hard intersection to hit. In fact, for the vast majority of content pieces, I’m going to say that it’s going to be close to, not always, but close to impossible to get that perfect mix of click-bait, intent of searchers, and your marketing goals. The times when it works best is really when you’re trying to educate your audience or provide them with informational value, and that’s also something that’s going to resonate in the social web and something searchers are going to be looking for. It works pretty well in B2B types of things, particularly in spaces where there’s lots of influencers and amplifiers who also care about educating their followers. It doesn’t work so well when you’re trying to target Viking battles or Viking jewelry. What can I say, the historians of the Viking world simply aren’t that huge on Twitter yet. I hope they will be one day.

    This is kind of the process that I would use to think about the structure of these and how to choose between them. First off, I think you need to ask, “Should I create a single piece of content to target all of these, or should I instead be thinking about individual pieces that hit one or two at a time?”

    So it could be the case that maybe you’ve got an intersection of intent for searchers and your marketing goals. This happens quite a bit, and oftentimes for these folks, for the Jell Dragon Viking Jewelry, the intent of searchers and what they’re trying to accomplish on their site, perfectly in harmony, but definitely not with click-bait pieces that are going to resonate on the web. More challenging for io9 with this kind of a thing, because searchers just aren’t looking for that around Viking jewelry. They might instead be thinking about, “Hey, we’re trying to target the specific news item. We want anyone who looks for Viking jewelry in Danish farm, or Viking jewelry found, or those kind of things to be finding our site.”

    Then, I would ask, “How can I best serve my own marketing goals, the marketing goals of my website through the pages that are targeted at search or social?” Sometimes that’s going to be very direct, like it is over here with JellDagon.com trying to convert folks and folks looking for Viking jewelry to buy.

    Sometimes it’s going to be indirect,. A Moz Whiteboard Friday, for example, is a very indirect example. We’re trying to serve the intent of searchers and in the long term eventually, maybe sometime in the future some folks who watch this video might be interested in Moz’ tools or going to MozCon or signing up for an email list, or whatever it is. But our marketing goals are secondary and they’re further in the future. You could also think about that happening at the very end of a funnel, coming in if someone searches for say Moz versus Searchmetrics and maybe Searchmetrics has a great page comparing what’s better about their service versus Moz’ service and those types of things, and getting right in at the end of the funnel. So that should be a consideration as well. Same thing with social.

    Then lastly, where are you going to focus that keyword targeting and the content foci efforts? What kind of content are you going to build? How are you going to keyword target them best to achieve this, and how much you interlink between those pages?

    I’ll give you a quick example over here, but this can be expanded upon. So for my conversion page, I may try and target the same keywords or a slightly more commercial variation on the search terms I’m targeting with my more informational style content versus entertainment social style content. Then, conversion page might be separate, depending on how I’m structuring things and what the intent of searchers is. My click-bait piece may be not very keyword focused at all. I might write that headline and say, “I don’t care about the keywords at all. I don’t need to rank here. I’m trying to go viral on social media. I’m trying to achieve my click-bait goals. My goal is to drive traffic, get some links, get some topical authority around this subject matter, and later hopefully rank with this page or maybe even this page in search engines.” That’s a viable goal as well.

    When you do that, what you want to do then is have a link structure that optimizes around this. So your click-bait piece, a lot of times with click-bait pieces they’re going to perform worse if you go over and try and link directly to your conversion page, because it looks like you’re trying to sell people something. That’s not what plays on Facebook, on Twitter, on social media in general. What plays is, “Hey, this is just entertainment, and I can just visit this piece and it’s fun and funny and interesting.”

    What plays well in search, however, is something that let’s someone accomplish their tasks. So it’s fine to have information and then a call to action, and that call to action can point to the conversion page. The click-bait pieces content can do a great job of helping to send link equity, ranking signals, and maybe some visitor traffic who’s interested in truly learning more over to the informational page that you want ranking for search. This is kind of a beautiful way to think about the interaction between the three of these when you have these different levels of foci, when you have these different searcher versus click-bait intents, and how to bring them all together.

    All right everyone, hope to see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.

    Video transcription by Speechpad.com

    Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!